Skip to main content
As for modern journalism, it is not my business to defend it. It justifies its own existence by the great Darwinian principle of the survival of the vulgarest.
Has any thought been given to the number of things that must remain active in men's souls in order that there may still continue to be “men of science" in real truth? Is it seriously thought that as long as there are dollars there will be science?
The actual modern mass-man is, in fact, a primitive who has slipped through the wings on to the age-old
stage of civilisation.